Does the collective wisdom of the Web really say that Penney has the most essential site when it comes to dresses? And bedding? And area rugs? And dozens of other words and phrases?And check Robert Stacy McCain's post, linking this to blog optimization: "Stupid Google Tricks."
The New York Times asked an expert in online search, Doug Pierce of Blue Fountain Media in New York, to study this question, as well as Penney’s astoundingly strong search-term performance in recent months. What he found suggests that the digital age’s most mundane act, the Google search, often represents layer upon layer of intrigue. And the intrigue starts in the sprawling, subterranean world of “black hat” optimization, the dark art of raising the profile of a Web site with methods that Google considers tantamount to cheating.
Despite the cowboy outlaw connotations, black-hat services are not illegal, but trafficking in them risks the wrath of Google. The company draws a pretty thick line between techniques it considers deceptive and “white hat” approaches, which are offered by hundreds of consulting firms and are legitimate ways to increase a site’s visibility. Penney’s results were derived from methods on the wrong side of that line, says Mr. Pierce. He described the optimization as the most ambitious attempt to game Google’s search results that he has ever seen.
“Actually, it’s the most ambitious attempt I’ve ever heard of,” he said. “This whole thing just blew me away. Especially for such a major brand. You’d think they would have people around them that would know better.”
Monday, February 14, 2011
J.C. Penney's Black Hat Search Scheme on Google
I'd call it a search strategy, but J.C. Penney denies any knowledge of this Google link-bait scheme. Either way, read the whole thing, at NYT, "Search Optimization and Its Dirty Secrets":
Labels:
Blogging,
Business,
Economics,
Google Search,
News,
Technology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment